May 31
Posted by: Meta4Life in: Politics, Religious Fundamentalism
After wrestling with a small mountain of data over the holiday weekend, I realized that my background in socio-cultural studies is too slim to write the kind of article I’d like to write about the recent influence of the right wing’s plunge into Judeo-Christianity on American culture. I can look at the tortures of Abu Graib and Guantanamo, and the incidents of religious and racial intolerance voiced by some religious leaders in this country, and sense the connections, the underlying patterns, a palimpsest of hatred and willful ignorance, that seems to shape this nation and its foreign policies. It has pseudo-religious over- and undertones. It occupies bandwidth on our airwaves. It persists in hinting of its existence even when we are most determined to ignore it.
There are more incidents, more quotes, more accounts than can easily be listed here. Those interested in following such matter should visit sites like ReligiousTolerance.org . What is disturbing is that these very extreme statements, policies and incidents aren’t coming from marginalized or extremist elements in our society. They’re coming from our leaders, originating in the highest echelons of our religious and political organizations, and defended by the kind of American who lives and works right next door to you. The American public is endorsing these acts and attitudes with their time, attention, money and votes, seemingly oblivious to the cognitive, emotional and moral disconnects they represent. They are equally unaware to the cost of such willful oblivion, measured in the gallons of American, Afghani and Iraqi blood drenching the sands half a world away, yet brought home to them on broadcast news every night.
If I’ve drawn any conclusions from this labor of Tantalus I’ve recently engaged, it’s that there are no coincidences, no isolated incidences, no accidental or off-hand remarks that don’t relate back to this elusive shadow structure that is at the heart of current American foreign and domestic policy. Exemplia gratis: When President Bush used the word “crusade,” I can no longer dismiss that as yet another unfortunate gaffe in a long list. Especially when Mark Racicot, head of the Bush/Cheney re-election campaign, later used the same word in a fund-raising letter. “From leading a global crusade against terrorism to signing into law two of the largest tax cuts in history, [Bush] has provided strong, steady leadership during difficult times.”
And when the president’s man in charge of finding top terrorists, Lt. Gen. William Boykin, is on record asserting that his targets are minions of Satan (my paraphrase of his words).
Or when the Republican leader of the Senate appears via telecast at a right-wing fundamentalist rally in an attempt to pressure other senators to help him pack federal circuit and appellate courts with other right-wing extremist judges…
The list goes on and on. I’m no proponent of conspiracy theories — I’ve always agreed with the idea of not assuming conspiracy where stupidity will suffice for an explanation. However, the palimpsest pattern here becomes too obvious to ignore, and I’m left here wondering for the 3,692nd time how in the hell I can explain this to that great slumbering American electorate in a way that will motivate them to get out and agitate for change.
Quote of the Day: What is objectionable, what is dangerous, about extremists is not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant. The evil is not what they say about their cause, but what they say about their opponents –Robert Kennedy
Metaphors For Life’s website
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.